[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GOP-PROP 5: build system output (probable 3)
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: GOP-PROP 5: build system output (probable 3) |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Aug 2011 13:19:57 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 05:17:23PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Reinhold Kainhofer"
> <address@hidden>
> >To see the warnings, you'll then have to wade through thousands of
> >log files...
>
> make doc already produces hundreds of warnings. It might be
> thousands, I've not counted. I don't see anyone paying any
> attention to them.
+1.
If we have a log file, you can do neat stuff like
grep "[wW]arning" doc-build.log
or even
grep "[wW]arning" make-build.log | wc && if `cut -f 1 -` != 0;
then echo "reject patch for adding warnings"; fi;
if all that junk is somewhere in your terminal buffer, then you're
screwed.
Look, we lose NOTHING by saving stuff to a file. If somebody
doesn't want to look at it, they don't need to. If somebody
*does* want to look at it, it's there. If somebody only realizes
that they wanted to look at something an hour after a build, it's
still there.
Besides, if you want that stuff in your terminal buffer, just go
ahead and do
make VERBOSE=1
It's right there in the second point of the proposal.
> Please can we stop re-going over this and get to a point where I can
> do something?
+1 +1
I'm amazed that Phil's still willing to work on this stuff.
Cheers,
- Graham
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: GOP-PROP 5: build system output (probable 3),
Graham Percival <=