[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Aug 2011 15:39:47 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 10:37:18AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Actually, I read this first as "bugs in undocumented features can't have
> high priority", carrying the message "if you don't document your new
> feature, we refuse to make fixing problems with it a high priority".
I wasn't going for that -- rather, that normal documentation
issues aren't high-priority. As long as a doc problem doesn't
stop somebody from working (such as a translation page not being
updated for technical reasons?), it's priority-medium.
Cheers,
- Graham
Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities, Phil Holmes, 2011/08/02
Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities, David Kastrup, 2011/08/02
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities,
Graham Percival <=