Re: 2.15.8 Regtests

[David Kastrup]

Keith OHara <address@hidden> writes:

> David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Keith OHara <k-ohara5a5a <at> oco.net> writes:
>> >
>> > Unless somebody objects, I will remove 'nested-property-revert.ly' from 
>> > the test suite; The test code still exists in the open issue 1063.
>> 
>> I'd like to keep this test as I am working on the full functionality.
>> It will likely get extended in the end to cover more cases, but it is
>> useful as a start already.
>
> Thanks, David.
>
> Since you are keeping a copy, and there is a copy on 1063, I will remove it
> from input/regression right away.
>
> Don't forget to make an extra copy before you next rebase the branch on which 
> you are working on 1063; you will probably need to `git add` it back to that 
> branch.

Looks like we associate differing meanings with one or several of the
words "unless", "somebody" or "objects".

-- 
David Kastrup