[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: custom engraver in scheme: accessing nested Music object
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: custom engraver in scheme: accessing nested Music object |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:24:10 +0100 |
On 10 August 2011 15:00, Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> wrote:
> Is there a way to change that order, or call the note-head-interface
> function again at the very end for processing a grob?
Acknowledger order depends on the order engravers are \consist-ed (the
only exception is if you set must-be-last to #t)
If you want to do useful things to the NoteHead, you should wait until
all the acknowledging has finished, i.e., store the NoteHead grob and
process the information in a process-acknowledged or
stop-translation-timestep function.
BTW, if you're prepared to wrap the notes in a chord (so you have
access to 'articulations), you won't even need a scheme engraver (all
the processing can take place in the NoteHead's stencil callback).
Cheers,
Neil
- custom engraver in scheme: accessing nested Music object, Ricardo Wurmus, 2011/08/10
- Re: custom engraver in scheme: accessing nested Music object, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2011/08/10
- Re: custom engraver in scheme: accessing nested Music object, Ricardo Wurmus, 2011/08/10
- Re: custom engraver in scheme: accessing nested Music object, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2011/08/10
- Re: custom engraver in scheme: accessing nested Music object, Ricardo Wurmus, 2011/08/10
- Re: custom engraver in scheme: accessing nested Music object,
Neil Puttock <=
- Re: custom engraver in scheme: accessing nested Music object, Ricardo Wurmus, 2011/08/10
- Re: custom engraver in scheme: accessing nested Music object, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2011/08/10
- Re: custom engraver in scheme: accessing nested Music object, Ricardo Wurmus, 2011/08/11