Re: Fixes footnote automatic numbering. (issue4877041)

[address@hidden]

On Aug 11, 2011, at 4:48 PM, address@hidden wrote:

> Regtest missing.
> 
> Much better now, but with my example there are still some
> inconsistencies. In particular, the ordering of the six footnotes in
> each of the systems is:
> 
> 1st system:
> 2  3  5
> 1  4  6
> 
> 2nd system (start at 7, shown here as 1):
> 1  4  5
> 2  3  6
> 
> 3rd system (2nd page):
> 1  3  5
> 2  4  6
> 
> So, while the numbers are now sorted by moment, two footnotes at the
> same moment are not consistently ordered.
> 

I've put a new patchset up that should do the trick.
Before I add a regtest, I want to figure out why your example intersects with 
the footnotes - that may be a separate bug that I can fix in this patch.

Cheers,
MS