[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Doc: add a note about \relative f to notation (issue 1909) (issue 50
From: |
dak |
Subject: |
Re: Doc: add a note about \relative f to notation (issue 1909) (issue 5096046) |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 07:50:05 +0000 |
http://codereview.appspot.com/5096046/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely
File Documentation/notation/pitches.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5096046/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely#newcode258
Documentation/notation/pitches.itely:258: If you carefully consider all
the rules above and remember that the
Probably a bit too contorted in the beginning.
Just "One consequence of these rules is that" would be quite more
concise, decreasing the chances of the reader falling asleep before he
gets to the conclusion.
Graham's warning against complex language was quite valid; the
"monosyllabic" version in the mail exchange a definite improvement. The
levity of language makes it fit less well with a reference manual,
though. Cutting down the starting sentence of the version quoted here
seems still prudent.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5096046/
- Doc: add a note about \relative f to notation (issue 1909) (issue 5096046), janek . lilypond, 2011/09/21
- Re: Doc: add a note about \relative f to notation (issue 1909) (issue 5096046),
dak <=
- Re: Doc: add a note about \relative f to notation (issue 1909) (issue 5096046), pkx166h, 2011/09/21
- Re: Doc: add a note about \relative f to notation (issue 1909) (issue 5096046), percival . music . ca, 2011/09/21
- Re: Doc: add a note about \relative f to notation (issue 1909) (issue 5096046), janek . lilypond, 2011/09/25
- Re: Doc: add a note about \relative f to notation (issue 1909) (issue 5096046), dak, 2011/09/25
- Re: Doc: add a note about \relative f to notation (issue 1909) (issue 5096046), percival . music . ca, 2011/09/26