[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Moving away from make
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Moving away from make |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Sep 2011 11:13:32 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 09:50:52AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Yes, various expert FLOSS members (such as Reinhold, Carl, and
> > IIRC yourself) have stepped forward to fix a few things in the
> > builds -- but the only people who are "working" on the build
> > system "full time" are windows users.
>
> Uh, you changed topic. The topic was "the casual contributor", not
> "working fulltime".
My apologies. You are correct. I need to stop talking.
Especially these days, when I'm disagreeing with everybody for no
good reason.
> In my opinion, jumping to yet-another-system instead of cleaning up the
> current system is a step backwards, unless one can prove that the
> current system can't provide the required functionality without
> exceeding reasonable complexity, and a new system can.
Agreed.
- Graham
- Re: Moving away from make, olafBuddenhagen, 2011/09/24
- Re: Moving away from make, Graham Percival, 2011/09/24
- Re: Moving away from make, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2011/09/24
- Re: Moving away from make, Graham Percival, 2011/09/24
- Re: Moving away from make, Graham Percival, 2011/09/24
- Re: Moving away from make, David Kastrup, 2011/09/25
- Re: Moving away from make, Graham Percival, 2011/09/25
- Re: Moving away from make, David Kastrup, 2011/09/25
- Re: Moving away from make,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: Moving away from make, David Kastrup, 2011/09/25
- Re: Moving away from make, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2011/09/25
- Re: Moving away from make, Karl Hammar, 2011/09/25