[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: replacement git-cl
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: replacement git-cl |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 03:33:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 04:02:12PM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Graham Percival
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> Once this script is fully tested and working, it will relieve a
> > lot of our current frustrations. Please switch to it -- even if
> > there's a problem with the new parts of the script, the original
> > behavior of the rietveld upload is completely unchanged, so you
> > lose nothing!
>
> Have you tried sending your commits back to Evan ? IIRC, he is very
> responsive.
I haven't tried contacting him yet. I'm not certain if sending
these upstream is appropriate;
- I'm importing a huge chunk of gdata-python in an ugly
duplication of code (because I don't want to ask casual lilypond
contributors to install gdata)
- the code.google.com stuff is only relevant to projects using
that, whereas git-cl is a more general tool. (that said,
git-cl could have a "post-upload hook" which we could use)
- we're still shaking out major bugs and annoyances with the new
git-cl, so I think it's premature in any case. :)
Once things settle down, I could point him at my github account in
case he sees anything worth taking?
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: replacement git-cl, (continued)
Re: replacement git-cl, Julien Rioux, 2011/09/26
Re: replacement git-cl, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2011/09/26
- Re: replacement git-cl,
Graham Percival <=