[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: the latest convert-ly fiasco
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: the latest convert-ly fiasco |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 08:53:20 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 07:02:48AM -0600, Colin Campbell wrote:
> In the interests of 'get it done and make the paper work agree',
> would you and Graham let me know which issues/patches are going
> through slightly different channels?
To be honest, I have no clue.
> I gather that most or all of this would be Rietveld only, so
> it's essentially invisible to the policy weeny, but if I can
> stay out of the way, I'd be glad to turn the blind eye.
I think the essential bit is the same.
- when it's time for a countdown,
1. pick a bunch of patches with Patch-review.
2. announce them
- when the countdown is done, look at any patches with
Patch-countdown, and then either:
3. if there are complaints, change it to patch-needs_work
4. otherwise, change it to patch-push
If a patch jumps from patch-new to fixed, or from patch-review to
fixed, or whatever, that shouldn't change anything as far as
you're concerned. When making the countdown you only care about
"patch-review" items; when finishing the countdown you only care
about "patch-countdown" items.
- Graham
Re: the latest convert-ly fiasco, David Kastrup, 2011/10/25