Re: Reintroduce beaming "begin" rules back to solve issues?

[Janek Warchoł]

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 2/22/12 4:40 PM, "Janek Warchoł" <address@hidden> wrote:
>>the only thing that i'm wondering about is why you decided to create
>>new properties.  From what i understand (please correct me if i'm
>>wrong) beaming all six eights in 3/4 time together can be easily
>>switched on and off using BeamExceptions.  For  a4. a8[ a a] vs  a4.
>>a8 a[ a] beaming, it's not possible to easily set it using
>>BeamExceptions - but why not use strictBeatBeaming for controlling
>>this?
>
> Because I may want to have both beamFullMeasure be true and
> beamHalfMeasure be false.  A beamExceptions of '(end . ((1 . 8) (6)))
> enables beamFullMeasure, but also enables beamHalfMeasure.  I can't think
> of an exception that allows beaming a full measure but not a half measure.
>
> strictBeatBeaming affects beam subdivision, not beam starting and ending.

ok - you win :)
thanks!
Janek