[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046)
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046) |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Apr 2012 14:02:23 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 01:44:14PM +0200, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
> As I understand, fixxcc.py will correct that automatically, so I don't
> have to bother about that? Nevertheless I'll remember that for my
> future patches.
fixcc.py can correct those, but this adds "noise" to the git
commit history. We generally prefer it if commits already follow
the correct style.
> For me it sounds like blaming me that I'm a beginner developer on
> Lilypond project, so my work isn't as optimized as it should be. It's
> not nice for me, really, and it doesn't encourage me to submit my
> patches either.
*sigh*
yes, this is a huge problem. You really need a mentor to guide
you through this process. Janek Warcho did this for a few months,
but he gave up due to university work.
I believe that you're both Polish, so I really *really* wish that
he would offer to guide you. You're in the same time zone, you
presumably speak the same native language, etc.
Honestly, if you don't have a mentor, I would actually recommend
that you stop trying to help lilypond for the next few months.
This is our fault, not yours -- the lilypond project unfortunately
cannot offer you a "fair" chance to help out. It might be better
in late summer.
I know that this is not a very positive message, but I am trying
to save you yet more anguish. The lilypond project currently does
not even function smoothly between senior developers with more
than 100 commits each; there is very little chance for a new
contributor to have a smooth and pleasant time helping us.
> I'd like to know how to run regtests. Should I
> follow:Â [6]http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/reg
> test-comparison and compare all those tests that differ?
Yes. You should be able to state confidently that any differences
between those comparisons are intentional.
- Graham
- Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046), k-ohara5a5a, 2012/04/23
- Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046),
Graham Percival <=
- Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046), Łukasz Czerwiński, 2012/04/25
- Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046), Graham Percival, 2012/04/26
- Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046), address@hidden, 2012/04/26
- Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046), James, 2012/04/26
- Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046), address@hidden, 2012/04/26
- Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046), David Kastrup, 2012/04/26
- Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046), James, 2012/04/26
- Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046), address@hidden, 2012/04/27
- Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046), Phil Holmes, 2012/04/27
- Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046), James, 2012/04/27