[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Stable release.
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Stable release. |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Jun 2012 08:24:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:07:38PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> > The release blocking issues could be fixed with minor reverts.
>
> The usual release blockers are not revertible. Even if the current set
> is get cleared out, history tells us that the time window of two weeks
> after unstable release is unlikely to finish before the next detected
> regression.
Well, we had at least a week when the only release-critical bug
was the po-replace translation thing. It's a bit silly that we
couldn't have a release due to a 5-line texinfo documentation
thing, and in retrospect I should have done a "hostile revert"
(especially since the commit in question didn't go through any
review or countdown). But since the developer survey was coming
up, I didn't want to open any new wounds. Also, I was more sick
of arguments than normal, so again I didn't want to start a new
fight.
In hindsight I should have reverted it. And if there's no clear
offer to fix it before tomorrow, I'll revert it anyway.
- Graham
- Re: Stable release., (continued)
- Re: Stable release.,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: Stable release., David Kastrup, 2012/06/26
- Re: Stable release., Jean-Charles Malahieude, 2012/06/26
- Re: Stable release., David Kastrup, 2012/06/26
- Re: Stable release., Graham Percival, 2012/06/26
Re: Stable release., Pavel Roskin, 2012/06/25