Re: regtests about very small differencies

[Janek Warchoł]

On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> I suggest that we adopt this as an official policy: fixes for
>> easy-to-overlook things should be documented by regtests using
>> big/enormous font-size (e.g. between 30 and 100, depending on
>> issue).  So, everyone checking regtests should pay extra attention
>> to details when he sees a big-font regtest, while small differences
>> between normal-sized tests can usually be ignored.
>
> This is a good idea, thanks.

thanks!
pushed as e8fc7813b17822c138150807484197ef8d4e7c21

Phil, if it'll be your job to fix bad regtests, you may want to keep
an eye on this.

cheers,
Janek