|
From: | Phil Holmes |
Subject: | Re: Instrument names |
Date: | Fri, 27 Jul 2012 17:56:41 +0100 |
-- Phil Holmes----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> To: "Graham Percival" <address@hidden>; "Keith OHara" <address@hidden>
Cc: <address@hidden> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 2:41 PM Subject: Re: Instrument names
----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham Percival" <address@hidden>To: "Keith OHara" <address@hidden> Cc: <address@hidden> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 12:48 PM Subject: Re: Instrument namesOn Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 02:32:42AM +0000, Keith OHara wrote:Phil Holmes <email <at> philholmes.net> writes: > So it would be easy to add something to the > indent here to take account of intrument names. The InstrumentName spanners can change when an instrument changes, or whenever the user feels like changing the text. The short-indent will affect line breaking, which could affect which instrument name goes at the front of each line. Even if output-def.cc can find all theInstrumentName spanners, it is hard to know which ones to pull informationfrom.Hmm. Could we just access the first instrument name, then set the indent according to that unless the user manually sets an indent? I think that will fix 99% of the "instrument names off the left-hand side of the page" problems. - GrahamI'm having a think about the best way to handle instrument changes, from a theoretical standpoint, not from an implementation one. Once I've checked what Sibelius does and if Gould mentions it, I'll update the list.-- Phil Holmes
Sibelius sets the left indent to accommodate the widest short name there is in the score. Gould doesn't explicitly mention left spacing for instruments names (that I can find, anyway) but all her scores do the same - the score is spaced to accommodate the widest instrument name.
--Phil Holmes
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |