[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Email from Phil's patchy
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Email from Phil's patchy |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Jul 2012 08:12:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
> Sorry, Marc. To do this completely, you will need to add the changed
> file to snippets/new. The files in snippets get over-written when we
> import from the LSR, so this update would be lost. However, to make
> current git compile, you do also need to keep this change in snippets.
>
> I realise this isn't completely straightforward, but that's the way it is...
I repeat: why change all the function names of functions with a public
interface in the first place when they have the same functionality?
Without a convert-ly rule, this will break user code. I cited some user
quote on the mailing list that will also break.
--
David Kastrup
- Email from Phil's patchy, phileholmes, 2012/07/28
- Re: Email from Phil's patchy, David Kastrup, 2012/07/28
- Re: Email from Phil's patchy, Phil Holmes, 2012/07/28
- Re: Email from Phil's patchy, David Kastrup, 2012/07/28
- Re: Email from Phil's patchy, Marc Hohl, 2012/07/28
- Re: Email from Phil's patchy, Marc Hohl, 2012/07/28
- Re: Email from Phil's patchy, Phil Holmes, 2012/07/28
- Re: Email from Phil's patchy,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Email from Phil's patchy, Marc Hohl, 2012/07/29
- Re: Email from Phil's patchy, David Kastrup, 2012/07/29
- Re: Email from Phil's patchy, Marc Hohl, 2012/07/29
- Re: Email from Phil's patchy, David Kastrup, 2012/07/29
- Re: Email from Phil's patchy, Marc Hohl, 2012/07/29