[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: preliminary GLISS discussions
From: |
Keith OHara |
Subject: |
Re: preliminary GLISS discussions |
Date: |
Sat, 1 Sep 2012 21:34:08 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwenn <at> gmail.com> writes:
> I am actually supportive of allowing digits in identifiers, it has
> irked me for years that we could not get it to work. I vaguely recall
> you implemented this in 2.16 already, but I guess I am mistaken?
>
If we abuse the syntax, we can write
"vn1M4m342" = gis''1
\new Staff { $vn1M4m342 }
Several of us have experimented with the lexer to allow \vn1M4m342
to avoid unusual use of '$'.
(It is slightly more complicated now that we have '-' and '_' in variable
names; we must forbid digits immediately after punctuation.)
The challenge is to allow the definition without the "" double-quotes.
Currently the parser has the lexer in 'notemode' when scanning at top-level,
vn1M4m342 starts with a pattern that could be a note, and it is difficult to
know when to expect notes when the syntax allows
\afterGrace dis2 cisis8 "vn1M4m342" = gis''1
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, (continued)
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2012/09/01
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Graham Percival, 2012/09/01
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/01
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/01
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/01
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/01
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/01
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions,
Keith OHara <=
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/01
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/01
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/01
Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Trevor Daniels, 2012/09/01
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/01
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/01
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/01
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/01
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Graham Percival, 2012/09/01
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/01