[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GLISS] non-timed or non-musical events "z" "y"
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: [GLISS] non-timed or non-musical events "z" "y" |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Sep 2012 19:23:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
> I don't follow this. If we can produce an unambiguous "expansion"
> of
> c'1-<< s4 s\< s2 z\! >>
> into
> << { c'1 } { s4 s\< s2 z\! } >>
> then surely it can be expressed as music functions.
\displayLilyMusic would have no chance reconstructing the input. The
meaning of - here is quite different to normal usage, there is no really
meaningful interpretation to things like
c'1-<< s4 s\< s2 z\! >>-.
as opposed to the normal alliterative meaning of accents, there is no
sensible interpretation to
x = -<< s4 s\< s2 z\! >>
in an assignment, or in a use as a music argument.
This is a quantum leap backwards in making LilyPond and Scheme
expressions and variables and functions and arguments in the parser work
and combine in a predictable manner.
I am working hard on stopping the Scheme layer from being something
entirely different and interacting in unpredictable ways with LilyPond
depending on where variables and function arguments start and end.
I really don't get why people are keen on destroying all progress we
have made regarding a straightforward relation between Scheme and
LilyPond.
> I know that you are not convinced that this can be done
> unambiguously, but that's what we're talking about.
Given the respective levels of work, expertise and planning invested in
the parser, I would wish for a modicum more of listening accompanying
the talking.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: [GLISS] non-timed or non-musical events "z" "y", (continued)
- Re: [GLISS] non-timed or non-musical events "z" "y", Graham Percival, 2012/09/13
- Re: [GLISS] non-timed or non-musical events "z" "y", Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/13
- Re: [GLISS] non-timed or non-musical events "z" "y", Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/13
- Re: [GLISS] non-timed or non-musical events "z" "y", David Kastrup, 2012/09/13
- Re: [GLISS] non-timed or non-musical events "z" "y", Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/13
- Re: [GLISS] non-timed or non-musical events "z" "y", David Kastrup, 2012/09/13
- Re: [GLISS] non-timed or non-musical events "z" "y", Graham Percival, 2012/09/13
- Re: [GLISS] non-timed or non-musical events "z" "y",
David Kastrup <=
- Re: [GLISS] non-timed or non-musical events "z" "y", Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/13
- Re: [GLISS] non-timed or non-musical events "z" "y", David Kastrup, 2012/09/13
- Re: [GLISS] non-timed or non-musical events "z" "y", Graham Percival, 2012/09/13
- Re: [GLISS] non-timed or non-musical events "z" "y", David Kastrup, 2012/09/13
- Re: [GLISS] non-timed or non-musical events "z" "y", Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/13
- Re: [GLISS] non-timed or non-musical events "z" "y", Graham Percival, 2012/09/14
- Re: [GLISS] non-timed or non-musical events "z" "y", David Kastrup, 2012/09/14
- Re: [GLISS] non-timed or non-musical events "z" "y", Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/14
- Re: [GLISS] non-timed or non-musical events "z" "y", David Kastrup, 2012/09/16
- Re: [GLISS] non-timed or non-musical events "z" "y", Graham Percival, 2012/09/22