[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Sep 2012 14:57:05 +0200 (CEST) |
> Currently, the parser is still undergoing significant restructuring
> work in major areas and mechanisms. That work entails a lot of time
> spent on ironing out parser conflicts where some input would
> correspond to multiple and diverging interpretations according to
> the current syntax. It is significant work ironing out those
> conflicts. Adding additional rules for erroneous input means more
> potential for conflict, so it would make the ongoing work even
> harder.
I suggest that the possibility of improved error messages should be
taken into account while doing design decisions.
> So I would first like to get to a state where I consider the
> parser/syntax to be mostly "in harmony" with its design before
> adding user-helpful error rules that make further work harder.
OK.
Werner
- [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Phil Holmes, 2012/09/14
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Phil Holmes, 2012/09/15
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, David Kastrup, 2012/09/15
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/15
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Phil Holmes, 2012/09/15
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/15
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, James, 2012/09/15
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/15
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Phil Holmes, 2012/09/15
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/15