[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands
From: |
Mathieu Huiban |
Subject: |
Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Sep 2012 20:39:28 +0200 |
Dear developers,
Thank you for your work on lilypond.
What about considering ( as a post-event and ) as a standalone event ?
c( )d( )e is symmetric and very clear.
best regards,
Mathieu
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 2:27 AM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> I don't think that distributing ( and ) between standalone event and
> post-event respectively is a concept that will carry the day
> sufficiently to be given a chance at a comeback. It would make
> (c (d) e)
> visually confusing. While neither the current
> c( d)( e)
> nor the standalone event version
> (c )(d )e
> will win a price for prettiness, they both beat (c (d) e) in conveying
> meaning rather than looking pleasing.
>
> --
> David Kastrup
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, (continued)
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, Xavier Scheuer, 2012/09/11
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, David Kastrup, 2012/09/11
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/09/11
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/11
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, David Kastrup, 2012/09/11
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/09/11
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, Graham Percival, 2012/09/12
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, David Kastrup, 2012/09/12
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands,
Mathieu Huiban <=
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, David Kastrup, 2012/09/17
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, Francisco Vila, 2012/09/13
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, David Kastrup, 2012/09/13