[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Broken time signature glyphs?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Broken time signature glyphs? |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:11:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
John Mandereau <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi Dominik,
> Il giorno mar, 18/09/2012 alle 04.38 -0700, ornello ha scritto:
>> timesig22-emmentaler16
>> <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n133112/timesig22-emmentaler16.png>
>>
>> timesig22-emmentaler20
>> <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n133112/timesig22-emmentaler20.png>
>>
>> timesig44-emmentaler16
>> <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n133112/timesig44-emmentaler16.png>
>>
>> timesig44-emmentaler20
>> <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n133112/timesig44-emmentaler20.png>
>
> This is kind of a known issue, encountered on different glyphs on older
> LilyPond versions:
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1683
>
> This has been fixed by requiring Fontforge 20110222 or newer in LilyPond
> 2.17.2 (see http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1637 ),
> so you probably want to upgrade Fontforge above the requirement of
> LilyPond 2.16.0.
>
> David, could we bump Fontforge minimum version to 20110222 for the next
> 2.16 release as well?
How would that have to be done?
--
David Kastrup