|
From: | Marc Hohl |
Subject: | Re: Doc: Improve documentation of \glissando. (issue 6529043) |
Date: | Thu, 20 Sep 2012 20:23:14 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0 |
Am 20.09.2012 20:08, schrieb address@hidden:
We normally do not include \override in most sections of the Notation manual. Instead, we ask users to submit LSR snippets showing the \override, then we include those snippets in the docs. This allows us to improve the documentation with minimal effort on the part of developers. If there's a special reason to include \override directly, then we can -- we do this when discussing automatic beaming, for example, because there's no sense in mentioning this without having overrides. But I'm not certain if this applies in this case?
So this means that the first, second and third example should go into a LSR snippet to be included in the documentation, the latter examples do not have any \override and can stay unchanged? At least this would make sense for me. Regards, Marc
http://codereview.appspot.com/6529043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list address@hidden https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |