Re: Provide \hide and \omit functions for transparent and void glyphs (issue 6575048)

[David Kastrup]

Marc Hohl <address@hidden> writes:

> Am 28.09.2012 17:40, schrieb address@hidden:

>>
>>> hmm... not quite perfect.
>>> No other idea, though...
>>
>> \here misses the relation to the next item (not that \single is much
>> better).  \directly was nicer in that regard.  \next would possibly also
>> work.
> Having to choose between \single and \next, I would take \next.

After thinking this over, I realized what worries me about \next: next
is a loop control command in a number of different languages like awk,
perl, Python.  It is also frequently used for linked list pointers.  All
of those common uses in computing are quite grammatically different in
their usage.

-- 
David Kastrup