[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision |
Date: |
Mon, 05 Nov 2012 11:15:08 +0100 (CET) |
> No, we're talking about the height of something like rests.1
> compared to rests.1o in the Feta font.
OK.
> The question is if these two glyphs have a different Y-extent
> (rests.1 versus rests.1o).
>From feta20.log, beautified:
whole rest 0 7.5 3.125 0 7.5 0 0
whole rest (outside staff) 0 7.5 3.125 0.50005 7.5 0 0o
half rest 0 7.5 0 3.125 7.5 0 1
half rest (outside staff) 0 7.5 0.50005 3.125 7.5 0 1o
So the answer is yes: The height (resp. the depth) is larger for
outside-staff glyphs.
Werner
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, (continued)
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, David Kastrup, 2012/11/05
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, address@hidden, 2012/11/05
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, David Kastrup, 2012/11/05
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, address@hidden, 2012/11/05
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, David Kastrup, 2012/11/05
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, address@hidden, 2012/11/05
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, David Kastrup, 2012/11/05
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, address@hidden, 2012/11/05
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/11/05
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, address@hidden, 2012/11/05
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, address@hidden, 2012/11/05
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, Keith OHara, 2012/11/05
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, address@hidden, 2012/11/06
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, Keith OHara, 2012/11/07
- Re: Design flaw in Rest_collision, address@hidden, 2012/11/07