Re: bar-line.scm

[address@hidden]

On 21 févr. 2013, at 01:11, Thomas Morley <address@hidden> wrote:

> 2013/2/20 Marc Hohl <address@hidden>:
> 
>> David convinced me that staying with ly: is the best way to go.
>> 
>> Marc
> 
> Yep.
> And I'm still convinced.
> Changing it would break too much.
> 
> OTOH, in IR 4. we list scheme-functions all prefixed with ly:
> I remember looking for a certain function to manipulate stencils,
> searching all the ly:stencil-...-functions in IR.
> Without success.
> In the end I found `stencil-whiteout´ in /scm/stencil.scm.
> 
> What about _documenting_ some/all of them in IR, too?
> 
> -Harm

Hey Harm,

I am cool with whatever - mostly, I just wanted to know the rule for one or the 
other so I can find them faster.  It is a time saver to know where certain 
things are stashed, but it's certainly not a big problem.

Cheers,
MS