Re: Uses only unpure-pure containers to articulate unpure-pure relationships. (issue 7377046)

[dak]

On 2013/02/27 23:00:48, mike7 wrote:
> On 27 févr. 2013, at 19:06, mailto:address@hidden wrote:

> >
> >

https://codereview.appspot.com/7377046/diff/17001/input/regression/scheme-text-spanner.ly
> > File input/regression/scheme-text-spanner.ly (right):
> >
> >

https://codereview.appspot.com/7377046/diff/17001/input/regression/scheme-text-spanner.ly#newcode129
> > input/regression/scheme-text-spanner.ly:129:
> > side-position-interface::y-aligned-side)
> > I really don't understand why you ask on the developer list about
> > gratuitous prefix changes because of a different implementation
language
> > when you propose such changes right afterwards.
> >

> In my e-mail, I stated:
> "I'd prefer if all native Scheme functions did not have the ly: prefix
- it
> helps to know what things are where."

So why do you ask when you ignore the answer?

> side-position-interface::y-aligned-side above is a native Scheme
function that
> does not have the ly: prefix.

You remove the prefix in this patch set.

> > https://codereview.appspot.com/7377046/diff/17001/lily/grob.cc
> > File lily/grob.cc (right):
> >
> >
https://codereview.appspot.com/7377046/diff/17001/lily/grob.cc#newcode866
> > lily/grob.cc:866: if (to_boolean (scm_object_property
> > (me->get_property_data ("stencil"), ly_symbol2scm ("ly:stencil?"))))
> > Where is this object property being set?

> In define-grobs.scm.

I've looked very thoroughly without success.  I can't find a setting
of the ly:stencil? object property in your patch set, and I can't find
it in the current code base, either.

Care for a line number?


https://codereview.appspot.com/7377046/