[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Some audicious hand-engraved slurs compared to LilyPond
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Some audicious hand-engraved slurs compared to LilyPond |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Dec 2013 15:51:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Mike Solomon <address@hidden> writes:
> On Dec 3, 2013, at 4:19 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> David Nalesnik <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>
>> So I wanted to share the slurs, and then LilyPond surprised me with
>> awful tuplet numbers.
>
> I’m guessing that there are a few things stopping the number from
> lining up nicely, but the most glaring one is line 526 of
> lily/tuplet-bracket.cc, which specifies that tuplet brackets should
> not follow kneed beams.
I find the version cranked out when setting
TupletBracket.bracket-visibility to ##t quite defensible.
I don't find it defensible that tuplet brackets interfere with tuplet
number placement when there are no actual tuplet brackets being typeset.
--
David Kastrup
Re: Some audicious hand-engraved slurs compared to LilyPond, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2013/12/03