Re: Website questions: Manual->Web

[David Kastrup]

Urs Liska <address@hidden> writes:

> Am 14.12.2013 05:01, schrieb Graham Percival:
>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 03:40:03PM -0000, Phil Holmes wrote:
>>> I _think_ the odd place of "web" in the manuals hierarchy is down to
>>> it being the only part of the documentation that built using "make
>>> website" - it has something of a split personality between being
>>> part of the documentation and the website.
>> No, there's three separate issues here.
>>
>> - lilypond.org/web/ : the old website
>>
>
> What is this old stuff good for?

Confusing search engines into misleading people there seems to be its
main purpose nowadays.  It's not totally clear whether it has other
functions at the moment that could disrupt the regular operations when
removed.

-- 
David Kastrup