Re: Add documentation for dodecaphonic-no-repeat (issue 61510043)

[lilyliska]

On 2014/02/10 12:50:27, J_lowe wrote:
> Thanks Urs.

> Some minor points.


https://codereview.appspot.com/61510043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely
> File Documentation/notation/pitches.itely (right):


https://codereview.appspot.com/61510043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely#newcode2453
> Documentation/notation/pitches.itely:2453: This rule reflects a
practice used by
> numerous contemporary
> This rule...

> Above we have used the term 'style' as opposed to rule I think. I have
no
> preference, but make sure we are consistent in this section, that's
all.

I see your point, but actually each accidental style's description
starts with "This rule".
I think this refers to the defined rule that is responsible for creating
the display style.

So I wouldn't change this.


> ...reflects a practice used by numerous contemporary...

> irrelevant (interesting but just 'fluff'), perhaps just remove the
first
> sentence entirely and start the next sentence (NB the '--' you use is
never
> repeated after the digression in the sentence, so it makes the
'While..' if the
> sentence look strange. So just start the sentence with 'Like the
dodecaphonic
> accidental...' and be done.

Done



https://codereview.appspot.com/61510043/