Re: Patchy email

[David Kastrup]

James <address@hidden> writes:

> On 13/02/14 10:16, Phil Holmes wrote:
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
>> To: <address@hidden>
>> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 9:59 AM
>> Subject: Re: Patchy email
>>
>>
>>> address@hidden writes:
>>>
>>>> 09:28:51 (UTC) Begin LilyPond compile, previous commit at
>>>> 9d481c2337e71dd7aef16ff696c6cf497d0d8865
>>>> 09:29:04 From ssh://git.sv.gnu.org/srv/git/lilypond
>>>>    9d481c2..9a085b1  master     -> origin/master
>>>>    c92b1fb..2d7f24a  release/unstable -> origin/release/unstable
>>>>    9d481c2..12de50b  staging    -> origin/staging
>>>>    d5fc7a0..1e6d2b3  translation -> origin/translation
>>>>  * [new tag]         release/2.19.2-1 -> release/2.19.2-1
>>>> 09:29:11 Merged staging, now at:
>>>> 12de50bb347074ba48e01b3d8b8c925d5978e0e4
>>>> 09:29:13 Success: ./autogen.sh --noconfigure
>>>> 09:29:28 Success: /home/patchy/patchybuild/autobuild/configure
>>>> --disable-optimising
>>>> 09:29:32 Success: nice make clean
>>>> 09:30:36 Success: nice make -j9 CPU_COUNT=9 -s
>>>> 09:32:42 Success: nice make test -j9 CPU_COUNT=9 -s
>>>> 09:48:44 Success: nice make doc -j9 CPU_COUNT=9 -s
>>>> 09:48:47 From ssh://git.sv.gnu.org/srv/git/lilypond
>>>>    9a085b1..12de50b  master     -> origin/master
>>>> 09:48:47 this Git revision has already been pushed by an operator
>>>> other than this Patchy.
>>>
>>> James' Patchy Staging, I hope.
>
> Nope not mine.
>
> I deliberately don't set up the email function to dev.

Oh, the mail was from Phil's Patchy of course.  I was referring to
Phil's Patchy's contention "this Git revision has already been pushed by
an operator other than this Patchy." and hoped that this operator was
yours.

-- 
David Kastrup