Re: [SPAM] Re: Test Ponding tweets

[Urs Liska]

Am 02.05.2014 17:31, schrieb Phil Holmes:
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Urs Liska" <address@hidden>
> To: "LilyPond Development Team" <address@hidden>
> Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 4:12 PM
> Subject: Test Ponding tweets
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > is there a convenient way to check a new ponding for correct syntax?
> > If I'm not mistaken a local website build won't show me the result of
> > a ponding, isn't it?
> >
> > So what to do with a ponding patch? Simply try to mimick the existing
> > ones and hope the patch will pass? Rather not, isn't it?
> >
> > TIA
> > Usr
>
>
> My understanding is that the tweet must simply be well-formed HTML: so
> if you can read it in an HTML editor, it should be good to go.

Not really. All the tags (i.e. the angled brackets) are displayed 
explicitly if I open the file in a browser.

> The text from the <tweet></tweet> is simply copied into the page by some
> javascript, so it should be unlikely to cause anything like a crash of
> the documentation build.  The worst that could happen is the front page
> would look odd until any error was corrected.

So this basically means what James says: I'll just upload the patch and 
see what happens ... (it's the one with a _new_ tweet).

Urs

> --
> Phil Holmes