Re: PATCHES: Countdown - May 9th - 06:00 GMT

[James]

On 06/05/14 10:05, Urs Liska wrote:
> On more question about the process:
>
> Am 06.05.2014 09:55, schrieb James:
> > 3911
> > <http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3911&q=label%3APatch-countdown%20OR%20label%3APatch-waiting%20OR%20label%3APatch-review%20OR%20label%3APatch-new%20OR%20label%3APatch-push&sort=patch&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Stars%20Owner%20Patch%20Needs%20Summary%20Modified> 
> >
> >      Enhancement     Urs Liska     push     Patch: Two minor fixes in
> > existing pondings
>
> I've now pushed that to staging, and this means it will eventually be 
> merged to master.
>
> Am I right that I should update the label on the issue tracker to 
> fixed when that has happened? Or can I do that now or will it be done 
> automatically?

The committer  should indicate that the issue has been pushed.

There is no 'standard' other than changing the 'status' field to 'fixed'.

However, some of us have started to put the commit ID of the checkin 
into the Tracker and we like to change the Label from Patch-Push to 
Fixed_x_y_z where X Y and Z are the build number of the current LP 
version in staging.

That way someone can look at the tracker and see at least what version 
of LP (stable or otherwise) the fix was introduced.

See

https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3905

as an example of what I do.

James