lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Cannot 'make' current master with (or without) PATCHY


From: James
Subject: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Cannot 'make' current master with (or without) PATCHY
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 12:49:19 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0




-------- Original Message --------
Delivered-To:   address@hidden
Received: by 10.152.99.147 with SMTP id eq19csp110922lab; Tue, 27 May 2014 04:16:02 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path:    <address@hidden>
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of address@hidden designates 10.51.17.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.51.17.99 Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of address@hidden designates 10.51.17.99 as permitted sender) address@hidden; dkim=pass address@hidden X-Received: from mr.google.com ([10.51.17.99]) by 10.51.17.99 with SMTP id gd3mr32670808igd.2.1401189361828 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 27 May 2014 04:16:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=xwDeHWIMEWWEJBmXdaqiJu37W9eXItLwU7rw0M+M/l4=; b=Uf6p25j1cAH7dG7o9+MCOQjG422R2YaN1bCH0VavhypCbz3dCagMAXvLPTyPOmIdOG dQbV4ycOinuUplYoSA8CHeydqt+MABIx+lFYvd5Kpc3HR6GdbPHDMv1ETJyA8vPAy25O nvmAcbK/BfyNGtDkisP28SFk3/lprrOJYxiwpo0DQnEMfMhHUaYUovmFo8hBcm7TQ/hI tB3zAuMfhvObP6VYgIcRO7dd5G7pHnQ9j4+Y0iqUb6k4q3prV5405becxMvcUheKB24G a44ogyKbKO3KqMRi/8n7l/X0vN/ZdrhunVlIDgJsCu9u/O+wXMvTjS3SO3nnQK66KL2k 2D+Q==
MIME-Version:   1.0
X-Received: by 10.51.17.99 with SMTP id gd3mr32670808igd.2.1401189361823; Tue, 27 May 2014 04:16:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.108.227 with HTTP; Tue, 27 May 2014 04:16:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.108.227 with HTTP; Tue, 27 May 2014 04:16:01 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To:       address@hidden
In-Reply-To:    <address@hidden>
References: <address@hidden> <address@hidden>
Date:   Tue, 27 May 2014 13:16:01 +0200
Message-ID: <address@hidden> Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Cannot 'make' current master with (or without) PATCHY
From:   Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden>
To:     James <address@hidden>
Content-Type:   multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113601462cb7fb04fa5fd2c2



I'll have a look at this tonight. If you need a fix earlier please revert this commit.

Op 27 mei 2014 12:55 schreef "James" <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>:

   Han-wen,

   Just an FYI as I am not sure how much you keep an eye on the
   LilyPond dev email lists.

   James


   -------- Original Message --------
   Delivered-To:        address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
   Received:    by 10.152.99.147 with SMTP id eq19csp107954lab; Tue, 27
   May 2014 03:03:13 -0700 (PDT)
   X-Received:  by 10.66.145.233 with SMTP id
   sx9mr11781420pab.151.1401184992790; Tue, 27 May 2014 03:03:12 -0700
   (PDT)
   Return-Path:         <address@hidden> <mailto:address@hidden>
   Received:    from smtpout17.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk
   <http://smtpout17.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk>
   (smtpout17.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk
   <http://smtpout17.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk>. [65.20.0.137]) by
   mx.google.com <http://mx.google.com> with ESMTP id
   cv2si17991466pbc.135.2014.05.27.03.03.11 for <address@hidden>
   <mailto:address@hidden>; Tue, 27 May 2014 03:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
   Received-SPF:        none (google.com <http://google.com>:
   address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden> does not designate
   permitted sender hosts) client-ip=65.20.0.137;
   Authentication-Results:      mx.google.com <http://mx.google.com>;
   spf=neutral (google.com <http://google.com>: address@hidden
   <mailto:address@hidden> does not designate permitted sender
   hosts) address@hidden
   <mailto:address@hidden>
   X-CTCH-RefID:
   
str=0001.0A090203.538462DF.00AF,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0

   X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw:
   score=7/97,refid=2.7.2:2014.5.19.53621:17:7.944,ip=,rules=__HAS_MSGID,
   __SANE_MSGID, INVALID_MSGID_NO_FQDN, __MSGID_32HEX, __HAS_FROM,
   __TO_MALFORMED_2, __IN_REP_TO, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ,
   __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END, __MIME_VERSION, __CT,
   __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __HAS_X_PRIORITY, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI,
   __HAS_X_MAILER, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, __ANY_URI, __URI_NO_MAILTO,
   __URI_NO_WWW, __CP_URI_IN_BODY, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE,
   BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_300_399, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY,
   __URI_NS, HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS,
   BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS
   X-CTCH-Spam:         Unknown
   Received:    from Advent (86.142.46.160) by
   smtpout17.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk
   <http://smtpout17.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk> (8.6.100.99.10223)
   (authenticated as address@hidden
   <mailto:address@hidden>) id 536B69E6013B2294; Tue, 27 May
   2014 11:02:53 +0100
   Message-ID:  <address@hidden>
   From:        Phil Holmes <address@hidden> <mailto:address@hidden>
   To:  Phil Holmes <address@hidden> <mailto:address@hidden>,
   James <address@hidden> <mailto:address@hidden>, Devel
   <address@hidden> <mailto:address@hidden>
   References:  <address@hidden>
   <mailto:address@hidden><address@hidden><address@hidden><address@hidden>
   <mailto:address@hidden> <address@hidden>
   <mailto:address@hidden>
   <address@hidden>
   In-Reply-To:         <address@hidden>
   Subject:     Re: Cannot 'make' current master with (or without) PATCHY
   Date:        Tue, 27 May 2014 11:03:09 +0100
   MIME-Version:        1.0
   Content-Type:        text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
   reply-type=response
   Content-Transfer-Encoding:   7bit
   X-Priority:  3
   X-MSMail-Priority:   Normal
   X-Mailer:    Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197
   X-MimeOLE:   Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18463



   OK.  I have confirmed that

   
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/lilypond.git/commit/?id=366316fd6be846c2050be6b1b3955b261026187e

   causes make to fail on a multi-CPU machine (8 cores, in the case of mine).
   I assume some sort of race condition causes one core to look for a file
   before another has created it.

   Could someone revert this change, please?

   --
   Phil Holmes







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]