[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: astyle 2.02
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: astyle 2.02 |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jun 2014 14:26:43 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 09:28:24PM -0400, Devon Schudy wrote:
> The cases where 2.04 does worse than 2.02 are minor; I don't think
> they're enough that fixcc.py should refuse to use it.
Thanks for the analysis of astyle 2.02 vs. 2.04. I support
switching to 2.04.
However, fixcc.py should reject any version other than the
specific version we want. Otherwise, you could run it on your
computer (and push it), then I could run it on my computer (and
push it), then you could do the same thing, and basically we'd end
up with an infinite sequence of formatting changes.
- Graham
- astyle 2.02, Janek Warchoł, 2014/06/23
- Re: astyle 2.02, Federico Bruni, 2014/06/23
- Re: astyle 2.02, Devon Schudy, 2014/06/23
- Re: astyle 2.02,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: astyle 2.02, Janek Warchoł, 2014/06/28
- Re: astyle 2.02, Devon Schudy, 2014/06/28
- Re: astyle 2.02, Janek Warchoł, 2014/06/28
- Re: astyle 2.02, Graham Percival, 2014/06/29
- Re: astyle 2.02, Janek Warchoł, 2014/06/29
- Re: astyle 2.02, David Kastrup, 2014/06/29
- Re: astyle 2.02, Devon Schudy, 2014/06/30