Re: Add original-breaks.ly commands (issue 150670043 by address@hidden)

[Graham Percival]

On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 10:21:45AM +0000, address@hidden wrote:
> I've not followed the corresponding email discussion closely, and maybe
> I've missed something, but how is this better than simply using \obreak
> for an original break, and \nbreak for a new, required, break, having
> defined
> 
> obreak = \break
> nbreak = <>
...
> That seems so simple anyone can do it without adding anything to the
> base code and almost a page to the documentation.

This method is already in the documentation!  At least, it used to
be... Learning Manual, "tips for typesetting" or something like
that?  it's just possible it was moved to Notation or Usage at
some point.  But it was definitely in the docs ten years ago.
(yes, literally 10 years ago.  Mao, where did the time go?)

Cheers,
- Graham