|
From: | Marc Hohl |
Subject: | Re: Compound time signature style |
Date: | Tue, 04 Nov 2014 10:49:55 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 |
Am 04.11.2014 um 07:48 schrieb David Kastrup:
Dan Eble <address@hidden> writes:If the simple-fraction components of a compound time signature respected the time signature style, would that qualify as useful or as undesirable? For example, 2 + 3 2 + 3 4 ----- + C vs. ----- + - 4 4 4Undesirable in my book.
I overlooked the fact that the denominators are the same, so either 2 + 3 4 ----- + - 8 4 in the case where there is no common denomiator, or 2 + 3 + 4 --------- 4 in the upper case. I'd rather not use the C symbol in these cases. Marc
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |