|
From: | David Kastrup |
Subject: | Re: Make Grob::name accessible to Scheme (issue 203090043 by address@hidden) |
Date: | Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:24:45 +0100 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Paul Morris <address@hidden> writes: > David Nalesnik-2 wrote >> On 2015/02/16 07:56:10, dak wrote: >>> "Needing to determine the name of a grob" should actually rarely be >>> necessary: >>> the pervasive information connected to the functionality of a grob is >>> rather its >>> interfaces. That's the usual criterion for deciding whether to deal with >>> a >>> particular grob. Relaying on the name makes it harder to create variants >>> of >>> existing grobs. >> >> I see what you are saying. I'm aware that grob recognition takes place >> through interfaces, and that the user could use grob::has-interface. > > Hmmm... would it be a good idea to also have a ly:grob-has-interface scheme > function? How would it differ from the existing grob::has-interface ? -- David Kastrup
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |