[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Replace C++ (in)equality checks with proper SCM syntax (issue 226840
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Replace C++ (in)equality checks with proper SCM syntax (issue 226840043 by address@hidden) |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Apr 2015 09:43:45 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden writes:
> What a mess. I inadvertently uploaded my "round 2" proposal onto this
> issue where it doesn’t belong.
>
> Since Rietveld doesn’t seem to offer a way of undoing it,
See the Button marked "Delete" in the following screen shot.
> please disregard "patch set #10" (#9 is the one actually being
> reviewed, with all of David’s suggestions taken into account).
>
> https://codereview.appspot.com/225380043 is the place where round 2 will
> be discussed.
>
> https://codereview.appspot.com/226840043/
>
--
David Kastrup
- Replace C++ (in)equality checks with proper SCM syntax (issue 226840043 by address@hidden), v . villenave, 2015/04/07
- Re: Replace C++ (in)equality checks with proper SCM syntax (issue 226840043 by address@hidden), nine . fierce . ballads, 2015/04/07
- Re: Replace C++ (in)equality checks with proper SCM syntax (issue 226840043 by address@hidden), dak, 2015/04/10
- Re: Replace C++ (in)equality checks with proper SCM syntax (issue 226840043 by address@hidden), v . villenave, 2015/04/10
- Re: Replace C++ (in)equality checks with proper SCM syntax (issue 226840043 by address@hidden), v . villenave, 2015/04/11
- Re: Replace C++ (in)equality checks with proper SCM syntax (issue 226840043 by address@hidden),
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Replace C++ (in)equality checks with proper SCM syntax (issue 226840043 by address@hidden), v . villenave, 2015/04/11
- Re: Replace C++ (in)equality checks with proper SCM syntax (issue 226840043 by address@hidden), pkx166h, 2015/04/21