Re: \acceptance for letting one context-def share accepts for another (issue 260800043 by address@hidden)

[dak]

On 2015/08/17 14:10:17, pwm wrote:
> LGTM.  This will make using custom modified contexts much simpler,
thanks!

> My only suggestion is that the plural form of "acceptances" sounds odd
if there
> are more than one:

> \layout {
>    % ...
>    \acceptances "MyStaff" "Staff"
>    \acceptances "MyLyrics" "Lyrics"
> }

> What about \accept-like instead?

> \layout {
>    % ...
>    \accept-like "Staff" "MyStaff"
>    \accept-like "Lyrics" "MyLyrics"
> }

> This is the name you suggested (for a different approach) here:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2015-03/msg00020.html

> I find it clearer and easier to understand than \acceptances.

The problem I have is that it's hard to remember the order of arguments.
 So I decided to use assignment-like order.  A reasonably good name
would have been just \accepts but that is already taken.


\acceptances is gruesome but so far I cannot think of anything that I'd
prefer in good conscience.

https://codereview.appspot.com/260800043/