[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Programming Language
|
From: |
Urs Liska |
|
Subject: |
Re: Programming Language |
|
Date: |
Thu, 11 Aug 2016 09:37:14 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 |
Am 10.08.2016 um 19:09 schrieb David Kastrup:
> C++ is a good career move, but the C++ in LilyPond's code base is of
> rather mixed quality and of rather mixed age: the early parts had to
> rely on the features available in early language standards. So C++
> skills acquired while working with LilyPond may be only moderately
> representative for the language as such.
You can also translate this to: "Learning C++ is a good idea. But you
shouldn't learn it through LilyPond but rather just learn it (somehow)
and *then* adapt your general knowledge when you want to contribute to
LilyPond."