[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 5027: NR example with bad engraving practice
From: |
Hans Åberg |
Subject: |
Re: 5027: NR example with bad engraving practice |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Jan 2017 15:01:45 +0100 |
> On 3 Jan 2017, at 23:57, Simon Albrecht <address@hidden> wrote:
> I know this is a bit on the edge of being too keen on my part, but I don’t
> consider this controversial at all from my engraving experience and knowledge
> of current best practice.
>
> NR 1.2.1.d
> <http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/writing-rhythms#ties>
> correctly says that ‘Ties should also be used when note values cross larger
> subdivisions of the measure’. However the example highlights (in 4/4 time)
>
> 8 8~ 2 r4
>
> as good example, where the half note still crosses the largest subdivision in
> the measure.
This is just a quirk of the 4/4 measure, also mentioned in Hindemith,
"Elementary Training", p. 30. In other words, the note should not cross the 2nd
and 4th metric accents, but it can cross the 2nd.
- 5027: NR example with bad engraving practice, Simon Albrecht, 2017/01/03
- Re: 5027: NR example with bad engraving practice,
Hans Åberg <=
- Re: 5027: NR example with bad engraving practice, Simon Albrecht, 2017/01/04
- Re: 5027: NR example with bad engraving practice, Hans Åberg, 2017/01/04
- Re: 5027: NR example with bad engraving practice, Simon Albrecht, 2017/01/05
- Re: 5027: NR example with bad engraving practice, Hans Åberg, 2017/01/05
- Re: 5027: NR example with bad engraving practice, Hans Aikema, 2017/01/05
- Re: 5027: NR example with bad engraving practice, Simon Albrecht, 2017/01/05
- Re: 5027: NR example with bad engraving practice, Hans Åberg, 2017/01/05
- Re: 5027: NR example with bad engraving practice, Hans Aikema, 2017/01/05
- Re: 5027: NR example with bad engraving practice, Thomas Morley, 2017/01/06
- Re: 5027: NR example with bad engraving practice, Trevor Daniels, 2017/01/05