[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GSoC 2017
From: |
tisimst |
Subject: |
Re: GSoC 2017 |
Date: |
Mon, 6 Mar 2017 15:16:50 -0700 (MST) |
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Noeck [via Lilypond] <
address@hidden> wrote:
> 1. Nathan was coding this, I just included this into oll and wrote the
> post.
Correct.
> 2. I guess it still works.
>
Yep. Mostly without problems, but it does have its limitations.
> 3. IIUC, this was just a set of overrides and callback functions picking
> up the correct symbols from a smufl font, doing the mapping by glyph
> name. So pretty much all you could do without touching lilypond directly.
> I guess for the GSoC the approach would be quite different and I hope
> Abraham can point into the right direction.
>
Personally, I think there's not much more that can be done with what is
already in OLL, but I don't think that's what we want done anyway. Full
SMuFL integration would be a more substantial improvement, IMHO.
Best,
Abraham
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/GSoC-2017-tp200631p200799.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Re: GSoC 2017, (continued)
- Re: GSoC 2017, Urs Liska, 2017/03/06
- Re: GSoC 2017, Werner LEMBERG, 2017/03/06
- Re: GSoC 2017, Urs Liska, 2017/03/06
- Re: GSoC 2017, tisimst, 2017/03/06
- Re: GSoC 2017, Urs Liska, 2017/03/06
- Re: GSoC 2017, tisimst, 2017/03/06
- Re: GSoC 2017, Urs Liska, 2017/03/06
- Re: GSoC 2017, Werner LEMBERG, 2017/03/11
- Font loading (was: GSoC 2017), Urs Liska, 2017/03/11
- Re: GSoC 2017, Noeck, 2017/03/06
- Re: GSoC 2017,
tisimst <=
- Re: GSoC 2017, Urs Liska, 2017/03/06
- Re: GSoC 2017, Werner LEMBERG, 2017/03/06