[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Chromatic solfedge
|
From: |
Dan Eble |
|
Subject: |
Re: Chromatic solfedge |
|
Date: |
Wed, 14 Feb 2018 19:56:20 -0500 |
On Feb 14, 2018, at 18:12, Simon Albrecht <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> And if so, would it be possible to extend this to a twelve-tone
>> chromatic-solfege notation, avoiding accidental suffixes, such as:
>> " d v r w m f x s y l z t”
[…]
> So you could just define v as the equivalent of cis
A glance at the lexer makes me think that “r” and “s” might require more than
that, though.
Regards,
—
Dan