[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rehearsal Mark positioning
From: |
Laura Conrad |
Subject: |
Re: Rehearsal Mark positioning |
Date: |
31 Aug 2001 13:32:03 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Academic Rigor) |
>>>>> "Han-Wen" == Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> writes:
Han-Wen> Rehearsal marks are always put on bar lines (between notes). This
Han-Wen> reflects standard practice AFAIK.
It can't be standard practice in music without barlines, though. Or
in music in general if they're at a point where there isn't a
barline.
Han-Wen> You could write a new engraver (or adapt the existing
mark-engraver)
Han-Wen> to wait for note heads, and tack the X position of the mark onto
the
Han-Wen> last note head. However, such an approach will still get wrong
results
Han-Wen> if the \marks in a score are not synchronised between different
Han-Wen> staffs.
That you'd expect; they're called rehearsal marks because you use them
at a rehearsal to tell all the parts to start at the same point. So I
always put them at a point where all the parts are starting a note (or
rest) at the same time, even when it's hard to find a point like this.
But if there aren't bars, I don't see what they could be attached to
besides a note. And if they're attached to a note, I would think they
should be positioned relative to the note.
Maybe it would be easier for me to figure out a way to put a counter
in the normal ^"text..." kind of syntax.
--
Laura (mailto:address@hidden , http://www.laymusic.org/ )
(617) 661-8097 fax: (801) 365-6574
233 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02139