[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: glissando
From: |
Mats Bengtsson |
Subject: |
Re: glissando |
Date: |
Tue, 07 May 2002 19:19:45 +0200 |
> To say the truth - I don't really get the idea of \relatives ->
> would that mean that with \relative c'
> i can write d e f g b c instead of d' e' f' g' b' c' ?
Certainly. Even better, you could write
d e f g b c d e f instead of d' e' f' g' b' c' d'' e'' f''
since for every interval, it will use closest option.
So, if for example the previous note was a "c" and you
ask for a "g", you'll get the g one fourth below the
c rather than that one a fifth above.
If you mostly stay within an octave but have several
steps larger than a fourth, you may prefer to use
\transpose instead. Example:
\transpose c'' {c b d a c g d b c}
/Mats
Re: glissando, Mats Bengtsson, 2002/05/07