[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: D7#9
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: D7#9 |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Sep 2002 15:05:09 +0200 |
address@hidden writes:
> when I get the time, I will look at what is there and what's wrong. I also
> think we need to have a discussion anyways about what "system"(s) we want
I don't think we need more discussion. We've had plenty of
discussions, and nothing conclusive seems to come out, because
everyone has a different idea of how chords must to look. What we need
is some solid and tweakable code.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen/
- D7#9, Jonathan Rosanowski, 2002/09/01
- FW: D7#9, Jonathan Rosanowski, 2002/09/01
- D7#9, Jonathan Rosanowski, 2002/09/02
- Re: D7#9, Atte Andre Jensen, 2002/09/03
- Re: D7#9, Atte Andre Jensen, 2002/09/03
- Re: D7#9,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: D7#9, Atte Andre Jensen, 2002/09/03
- Re: D7#9, Jonathan Rosanowski, 2002/09/03
- Re: D7#9, David Raleigh Arnold, 2002/09/03
- Re: D7#9, Thomas Willhalm, 2002/09/04
- Re: D7#9, David Raleigh Arnold, 2002/09/04
- Re: D7#9, Thomas Willhalm, 2002/09/04
- Re: D7#9, David Raleigh Arnold, 2002/09/04
RE: D7#9, Jonathan Rosanowski, 2002/09/03