|
From: | Paul Scott |
Subject: | Re: \key |
Date: | Sun, 29 Sep 2002 02:23:48 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020615 Debian/1.0.0-3 |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
It would be quite logical if there were an equal probability of notes in a composition being in or out of the current key.Paul Scott <address@hidden> writes:change your f's to fis and it'll be fine.Ok. That doesn't seem logical to me and it's clearly more workWant an f? Get an f. Want a fis, get a fis. Quite logical.
Even though it's not exactly comparing apples to apples, in Finale the entered notes are automatically in the current key and extra clicking raises or lowers the pitch. In my example I would type 'f' plus some modifier to get f natural or f double sharp. It would take more typing to get an accidental just as it takes more work to get an accidental when copying by hand.What do you mean by more work? How would you think to produce an f (natural) in your example?
Paulp.s. I am getting two copies of everything from this thread. The first one of each pair lacks the last three identification lines.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |