[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: nested lilypond-book files?
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: nested lilypond-book files? |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Apr 2003 14:37:18 +0200 |
address@hidden writes:
> What you can use is the standard LaTeX procedure for splitting a
> document into several files, using \include or \input (read
> some LaTeX introduction on the difference between these two).
> However, for some strange reason, you should use the commands
> \mbinclude and \mbinput instead in lilypond-book. This was
The strange reason is that lilypond-book does something different than
tex when it comes to including: lilypond-book substitutes the
contents. This means that you get a different result, eg. if the
included file contains \endinput.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen
- Re: nested lilypond-book files?,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=