Re: split-subbeam direction

[Rune Zedeler]

Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:

> We recently talked with Paul Roberts,  a notation guru that explained
> to us that it should really be
>
>      |  |  |  |
>  |----------------|--|--|
>  |---|--|--|  |---|--|--|  
>  |                |  |  |  
>
>
> (the 1st stem determines the "direction" of the beam)

I don't understand. Does this mean that


   |  |
   |  |
   | -+
+--+--+
+-
|
|


is incorrect and should be


   |  |
   |  |
+--+--+
+-   -+
|
|


?

-Rune