[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
general question regarding appoggiaturas and acciaccaturas
From: |
Jost Schenck |
Subject: |
general question regarding appoggiaturas and acciaccaturas |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Oct 2003 12:18:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.1 |
Hi,
I'm rather new to LilyPond and music typesetting and currently doing my first
larger work. While porting my files to version 2.0.0 I noticed that LilyPond
now has \appoggiatura and \acciaccatura keywords, which makes things much
easier (not having to set stroke-style every time etc.). These keywords
always add a slur.
Now, in a rather old music edition I am currently transcribing, both
appoggiaturas and acciaccaturas are sometimes slurred sometimes not. I know
that I can still create an unslurred grace with the \grace keynote -- but I
wonder where is the difference and if maybe the editor of my edition just
didn't really care. As to me it seems hard to distinguish slurred and
unslurred graces (well, harder than slurred normal notes) and as slurred
appoggiaturas/acciaccaturas are default now in LilyPond I wonder whether this
is rather a change in notation style over the centuries than a real musical
difference. Can somebody enlighten me on this? Can I just use slurred graces
or should I stick to the difference my edition makes?
Thanks a lot,
-Jost.
- general question regarding appoggiaturas and acciaccaturas,
Jost Schenck <=