Re: MIDI repetition

[Alberto Manuel Brandão Simões]

In the other hand, to unfold them makes the paper output to be unfolded
too :(

But, as it is at the moment, I think lilypond can only win having midi
output :)

Alb

On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 16:54, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> One main reason not to include the repetitions by default is that
> the MIDI generation in LilyPond is mainly intended for "proof reading"
> a score. The ambition has never been to make a fullfledged sequencer
> with professional MIDI output.
> 
>     /Mats
> 
> Alberto Manuel Brandão Simões wrote:
> > Hi
> > I found
> > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.0/input/test/out-www/lily-429032051.ly,
> > the example for unfolding repeats, and it works (great!)
> > 
> > My question is: if we write repetitions on the music (and if the
> > composer wrote them) it means we want to repeat them. Why to add a new
> > command to unfold them? Wouldn't it be better to oposite? (a flag if you
> > do not want to unfold at all?)
> > 
> > Just my five cents.
> > Alberto
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Lilypond-user mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user